Skip to main content

Provide A Sitemap, To Enable Indexing Of Pages

With (static) pages becoming a popular component in our blogs, we are seeing a few queries about getting pages content indexed.

We see an occasional query, in Blogger Help Forum: Learn More About Blogger, which leads to using the new pages sitemap.
How do I get pages indexed?
Aside from the design issue, where not all blog owners should want pages indexed, there should not be an issue here.

Blogger provides two automatically generated sitemaps, for each blog. This blog has

Most blogs use the posts sitemap - and ignore the pages sitemap.

If you look at the "robots.txt" file for this blog, you see the first sitemap in use. The file for your blog, if standard, should be similar.

User-agent: Mediapartners-Google
Disallow: 

User-agent: *
Disallow: /search
Allow: /

Sitemap: http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/sitemap.xml


Note the presence of "sitemap.xml" - and the absence of "sitemap-pages.xml". This blog has no indexable content, in the static pages.

If I wanted to index my static pages- and there are significant differences between pages and posts, that generally makes indexed static pages not so useful - I could add "sitemap-pages.xml", to complement "sitemap.xml".

For details on adding "sitemap-pages.xml", to your "robots.txt" file, see here.

User-agent: Mediapartners-Google
Disallow: 

User-agent: *
Disallow: /search
Allow: /

Sitemap: http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/sitemap.xml
Sitemap: http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/sitemap-pages.xml



Static pages are not indexed, deliberately - but random indexing will take place.

Static pages are not indexed, deliberately - though there can be some random links that lead to indexing. With blogs, search engines index dynamic content - aka posts, deliberately.

If you publish a website as a Blogger blog, you may want the website indexed - and that is why you might use the pages sitemap. Be aware of possible confusion, from a blog built with static pages.

This blog has no indexable static content.

Besides having no indexable static content, this blog has some non indexable static content. I wrote one article, which is carefully mirrored between a page ("static page") and a complementary post ("dynamic page") - which discusses the differences between pages and posts.

Were both the dynamic and static pages of that specific article to be indexed, in this blog, the search engines might levy a duplicated content penalty. Your blog may differ - and that is why Blogger provides "sitemap-pages.xml", and the option to index static pages.

It's your blog - and your choice to make.

Most blog owners will publish posts (dynamic pages) as blog content, and use static pages sparingly, as static (non indexed) accessories. Blogger, as a default, leaves "sitemap-pages.xml" out of "robots.txt" - but you can add pages, as indexed content, if you wish.

Comments

Robert Schott said…
I am using blogger with a custom domain name. I have created several 'pages' and have them linked with the menu bar at the top of the blog. Are you saying that those pages are not looked at by search engines unless I add a pages sitemap to robots.tx.
thanks,
Chuck Croll said…
Hi Robert,

Thanks for the question.

Any "page" - whether dynamic or static - can be linked, and any linked page can be randomly indexed when the blog is being indexed. So the term "not looked at" is rather extreme.

Deliberate indexing, using a sitemap, is the best way to ensure indexing of specific content. If you want your pages indexed, because the blog only contains pages, you have to add a pages sitemap.

If you want your pages indexed, and the blogs contains posts, and possible links to the pages, the pages may be indexed - but again, I'd add a pages sitemap to ensure indexing.

If you don't want the pages indexed, at all, I'd add "nofollow" to all pages links.

So, it's just up to you, what you want.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2010/06/blogger-magic-search-engine-indexing.html
muffin2 said…
This has been very helpful. Thanks
When you say "Blogger provides two automatically generated sitemaps, for each blog. This blog has
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/sitemap.xml
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/sitemap-pages.xml

My robots.txt shows only one and it's the sitemap-pages.xml I am particularly interested in soi that pages are ultimately searchable in my blog - currently they are not.

So how do I get sitemap-pages.xml into my robots.txt file?
Chuck Croll said…
Hi Muffin,

Thanks for the question.

You make a custom "robots.txt" file, using the the "Custom robots.txt" wizard on the dashboard Settings - "Search preferences" page.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2015/07/customise-robotstxt-file-for-your-blog.html

Popular posts from this blog

Custom Domain Migration - Managing The Traffic

Your blog depends upon traffic for its success.

Anything that affects the traffic to your blog, such as any change in the URL, affects the success of your blog. Publishing the blog to a custom domain, like renaming the blog, will affect traffic to your blog. The effects of the change will vary from blog to blog, because of the different traffic to every different blog.Followers. People who find your blog because of recommendations by other people.Search engines. Robotic processes which methodically surf your blog, and provide dynamic indexing to people who search for information.Subscribers. People who read your content from their newsfeed reader, such as the dashboard Reading List.Viewers. People who read your content from their browser.No two blogs are the same - and no two blogs will have the same combinations of traffic sources.

Stats Components Are Significant, In Their Own Context

One popular Stats related accessory, which displays pageview information to the public, is the "Popular Posts" gadget.

Popular Posts identifies from 1 to 10 of the most popular posts in the blog, by comparing Stats pageview counts. Optional parts of the display of each post are a snippet of text, and an ever popular thumbnail photo.

Like many Stats features, blog owners have found imaginative uses for "Popular Posts" - and overlook the limitations of the gadget. Both the dynamic nature of Stats, and the timing of the various pageview count recalculations, create confusion, when Popular Posts is examined.