Skip to main content

The Detail Numbers In Stats Will Never Balance

The Blogger activity analysis tool Stats is becoming pretty popular among Blogger blog owners - but the growth in popularity is irregular.

There are misunderstandings about the depth and scope of the statistics provided, in the Stats displays. Some blog owners are keeping logs, or maybe spreadsheets, from the numbers - and are adding up the numbers displayed, by rows and columns. Having added up the numbers, they are finding discrepancies.
My 'All Time' Stats are inconsistent with 'Monthly' Stats!
Stats doesn't include all countries in "All Time" views!!

For any given time period, you'll find total counts for that period available on the "Overview" display.

Each Stats list shows only 10 entries, ignoring the actual detail count.

For the same time period, you can go to the "Audience" display, and observe the 10 most active / popular Browsers, Countries, and Operating Systems - and try to compare to "Posts" (and "Pages").

Most blogs, if they don't have a very regionalised audience, will have traffic from more than 10 countries during any time period of any length. If you add up the counts for the 10 most active countries, it's highly unlikely that the number will add up, exactly, to the total from "Overview".

In a mature blog with any significant number of posts, it's not terribly likely that the same 10 posts will be consistently featured during all different time periods. Posts published during this week won't yield the same "all time" activity as posts published during 2010.

Each week, you should expect to see posts published during that week - or maybe the previous week - showing with more activity than older posts, during that period. Yet the older posts, having been around longer, will show more overall activity.

All pageview counts do not come from people reading individual post pages.

Posts activity will never account for all activity in the blog.

Archive retrievals, (dynamic) page (aka "posts") views, label searches, main page views,and (static) page (aka "pages") views - all count in the Audience, Overview, and Traffic Sources pageview totals. Even with a new blog - with less than 10 posts - you'll never get the individual posts pageview counts to consistently add up to any pageview total counts.

Stats is best used, to identify trends - not immediate changes in activity.

Stats is a good tool to highlight trends - and provides statistics that you simply won't get from other visitor logs or meters.

Used properly, you'll be able to observe areas of activity - and areas where improvement is needed. Observing the techniques used in the more popular posts, and during the more active periods, you can see which techniques you can apply to the less popular posts, and try for improvement overall.

Stats will never provide a complete picture, of all visitor activity, consistently. If you want complete statistics, you're going to have to make them yourself, based upon visitor logs or meters, like FlagCounter, SiteMeter, and StatCounter.

Alternately, instead of worrying about the details, why not spend more time working on the blog - and improve what is needed? More publishing, less worrying.


DaisyCrazy said…
The stats feature is very useful cause we can see what readers prefer.

I'd like to ask whether a 'returning readers vs first time readers' feature will be added in the stats. I believe it would be really handy to see who come back time and again and who happen to stumble on your blog once.
Evelyn Mayfield said…
I would love to be able to display my Posts for myself, and hit a button and have them rearranged according to "number of views," or be able to "reverse the date order" from time to time...Do you think that will ever be possible?
Chuck Croll said…
Hi Evelyn,

Thanks for the question.

In reality, no I don't think dynamic resequencing will ever be possible. The post sequence is based on what a blog is - and the physical arrangement of the content is that way.

A blog is an online journal - similar to a diary. Content is archived, naturally. As new content is added, old content gets pushed off the home page, into the archive pages. Reverse date sequence is the foundation of a blog.

There are a few hotshot coders who recommend fancy code tweaks or templates, which let posts be displayed in different order - but they are all prone to disaster. Some are blatantly malicious.

This will remain in my Top 10 List of Beliefs about Blogger. Posts will be displayed in reverse date sequence. That's a core design feature.

You can make your blog display in any sequence that you like - by changing the date and / or time on the posts. That's your only natural option.

Popular posts from this blog

Stats Components Are Significant, In Their Own Context

One popular Stats related accessory, which displays pageview information to the public, is the "Popular Posts" gadget.

Popular Posts identifies from 1 to 10 of the most popular posts in the blog, by comparing Stats pageview counts. Optional parts of the display of each post are a snippet of text, and an ever popular thumbnail photo.

Like many Stats features, blog owners have found imaginative uses for "Popular Posts" - and overlook the limitations of the gadget. Both the dynamic nature of Stats, and the timing of the various pageview count recalculations, create confusion, when Popular Posts is examined.

Help! I Can't See My Blog!

I just posted to my blog, so I know that it's there. I can tell others are looking at it. But I can't see it.

Well, the good news is you don't have a blog hijack or other calamity. Your blog is not gone.

Apparently, some ISPs are blocking *, or maybe have network configuration or infrastructure problems. You can access or you can access, but you can't access, or

You can't access them directly, that is. If you can access any free, anonymous proxy servers, though, you may be able to access your blog.

Note: You can use PKBlogs with the URL pre packaged. Here is the address of this post (with gratuitous line breaks to prevent the old post sidebar alignment problem):

And an additional URL, to provide to those suffering from this problem, would be the WordPress version of this post: