Skip to main content

Not All Template Designer "Advanced" Wizards Work

An occasional blog owner reports frustration with various "Advanced" Template Designer wizards, in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue.
I have entered my new colour palette under "template>advanced>" - and the colours will not show up on the blog.

I even checked that the colour values were right under "Edit HTML".
This blog owner wants different background colours, than are provided as defaults - and does not understand why the wizards, that advise
Template applied.
simply don't work.

The problem, with blogs that use a "Simple" template, is that the template does not contain the CSS rules required, to allow the wizards to produce results.

Every "Advanced" wizard uses 3 elements.

Every Template Designer "Advanced" setting wizard requires 3 elements.
  1. The GUI wizard (below).
  2. The "Variable definitions" section, which defines the GUI wizards (below), and the CSS variables.
  3. The CSS rules, that use the variables.

The "Simple" templates omit the necessary CSS rules.

Every template provides #1, and #2. "Simple" omits #3, for various wizards.


At least 3 "Advanced" wizards don't work, with "Simple" templates.



This paragraph of "Variable definitions" code appears to be common to all templates.


This is one known problem "Advanced" wizard group.

<Group description="Backgrounds" selector=".body-fauxcolumns-outer">
<Variable name="body.background.color" description="Outer Background" type="color" default="#66bbdd"/>
<Variable name="content.background.color" description="Main Background" type="color" default="#ffffff"/>
<Variable name="header.background.color" description="Header Background" type="color" default="transparent"/>
</Group>


The group requires CSS rules, which use 3 variables.

For the 3 wizards to work, the template needs CSS rules to use

  • body.background.color
  • content.background.color
  • header.background.color

The required CSS rules just are not present, in some templates.

Each of the above 3 CSS names are present only in the "Variable definitions" section. In the "Simple" template, there are no CSS rules to make the variables useful.

I've seen this a couple times. Some templates are not complete. This is a frequent annoyance, with some custom third party templates.

"Simple" is just that.

There are solutions.

There are several possible solutions, in order of reality.
  1. Use a different template.
  2. Remove the extraneous code from the "Simple" template.
  3. Add the necessary CSS, to use the variables defined.

Most blog owners, reporting the problem, will opt for #1 - though I suspect that this omission has caused some confusion that is not reported.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stats Components Are Significant, In Their Own Context

One popular Stats related accessory, which displays pageview information to the public, is the "Popular Posts" gadget.

Popular Posts identifies from 1 to 10 of the most popular posts in the blog, by comparing Stats pageview counts. Optional parts of the display of each post are a snippet of text, and an ever popular thumbnail photo.

Like many Stats features, blog owners have found imaginative uses for "Popular Posts" - and overlook the limitations of the gadget. Both the dynamic nature of Stats, and the timing of the various pageview count recalculations, create confusion, when Popular Posts is examined.

Free Domain Registration By "UNONIC" Is Fraudulent

Blogger blog owners, like everybody else, like to save money.

Some blog owners prefer to save money when registering a custom domain, for their blogs. We've seen several free domain registration services, providing what is claimed to be a two level Top Level Domain "co.xx" (where "xx" == various country codes).

The latest in this ongoing story appears to be "net.tf" - and 13 other "top level domains".There is also an additional free service offering third-level .tf domains, under the name United Names Organisation. They occupy 14 second-level domains, including .eu.tf, .us.tf, .net.tf, and .edu.tf. They are run by the same company as smartdots.com, and are given away as URL redirections.